Source-grounded. Human-reviewed.

Create trusted assessments faster—without sacrificing control, consistency or quality

Use AI to create reviewable questions, build balanced assessments, generate comparable versions, deliver them and learn which questions actually worked.

For schools, universities, training providers, certification organizations and workplace learning teams.

Rigoriva · CBSE Class X Mathematics · comparable exam sets
Assessment plan
  • Number systems20%
  • Algebra35%
  • Geometry25%
  • Statistics & probability20%
32 participants · 6 comparable versions · balanced assignment
Q1
Reviewed and approved

Find the HCF of 180 and 252 using Euclid's division algorithm.

Q2
Reviewed and approved

Solve the pair of linear equations: 2x + 3y = 11 and x − 2y = −3.

Q3
Reviewed and approved

Prove that the tangent at any point of a circle is perpendicular to the radius through the point of contact.

Representative example. Figures are illustrative, not live data.

Creating questions is easy. Creating an assessment you can trust is harder.

A quality assessment must measure the right knowledge and skills, use appropriate questions, maintain comparable difficulty across versions and provide evidence about how well it performed.

Creating quality assessments takes time

Defining requirements, writing questions, reviewing content, building versions and preparing scoring guidance involve substantial manual work.

The result: Hours of repetitive work.

Coverage is difficult to control

An assessment may contain enough questions while still missing important topics, skills or difficulty levels.

The result: Important requirements get missed.

Different versions may not be comparable

Shuffling or randomly selecting questions creates different-looking papers, but not necessarily comparable coverage and difficulty.

The result: Different-looking does not mean comparable.

Results do not explain assessment quality

A final score does not show whether questions were confusing, ineffective or inconsistent across versions.

The result: Weak questions get reused.

Today this work is often manual and fragmented across documents, spreadsheets, generic AI tools, Question Banks and delivery platforms. Rigoriva connects them.

Create your way

Two answers to the same problem. Start quickly when something is needed today, or use the structured workflow when coverage, comparability and oversight matter. Both keep human review in place.

Fast path

Quick Exam

Create a quiz, test or assessment quickly. Select the subject matter, difficulty and question mix, review the questions and prepare it for delivery.

  • Simple guided setup
  • AI-drafted or existing questions
  • Review and editing before use
  • Assignment, grading and results
Governed path

Structured Assessment

Use source material, learning goals, governed Question Banks, assessment blueprints, comparable versions, approvals and advanced quality analysis when consistency and oversight matter.

  • Source material and requirement alignment
  • Blueprint-driven design
  • Question review and governance
  • Comparable assessment versions
  • Advanced quality analysis

Both paths run on the same platform, Question Bank and review rules — choose the one that fits the assessment in front of you.

One connected assessment lifecycle

Rigoriva connects assessment design, AI-assisted question creation, human review, comparable versions, delivery, grading and quality analysis in one platform.

  1. 01

    Define requirements

    Identify the knowledge, skills, coverage, difficulty and format to assess.

  2. 02

    Create and review

    Draft questions with AI, then edit, validate and approve them.

  3. 03

    Build and check

    Assemble balanced assessments and create comparable versions where needed.

  4. 04

    Deliver and grade

    Assign assessments, collect responses and review scoring.

  5. 05

    Analyze and improve

    Examine performance and assessment quality, then improve future assessments.

From fragmented tasks to one connected process

  • Fragmented approach

    Questions created in documents or generic AI tools

    With Rigoriva

    Questions grounded in source material and assessment requirements

  • Fragmented approach

    Coverage checked manually

    With Rigoriva

    Blueprints check coverage, difficulty and format

  • Fragmented approach

    Versions created by copying or random selection

    With Rigoriva

    Comparable versions are built against common requirements

  • Fragmented approach

    Generated content may lack a formal review process

    With Rigoriva

    Questions remain reviewable, editable and governable

Assessment design

Build the assessment before selecting the questions

Define what the assessment should measure—including topics, knowledge or skills, difficulty, marks and question types. Rigoriva then assembles questions against that plan and identifies requirements the available Question Bank cannot satisfy.

  • Topic, knowledge and skill coverage
  • Difficulty and cognitive demand
  • Marks and question-type balance
  • Feasibility checks against your Question Bank
  • Review and approval where configured
Assessment blueprint · CS 210 midterm
Topic coverage
  • Data structures40%
  • Algorithms35%
  • Complexity25%
Difficulty mix
  • Easy20%
  • Medium50%
  • Hard30%
Question types
  • Multiple choice60%
  • Written response40%
Feasibility check: enough approved questions for every requirement.
Controlled variations · Graph algorithms
  • Original — shortest path on a weighted graphApproved
  • Variation A — same skill, different graphReady
  • Variation B — same skill, extra constraintReview
  • Variation C — changes what is measuredNot comparable
Question quality

Different questions that test the same thing

Create controlled variations of a question while preserving its underlying knowledge, skill, difficulty and assessment purpose. Rigoriva checks each variation and flags those that may not be comparable.

  • Generate variations from an approved question
  • Review the original and its variations together
  • Classify variations as comparable, needing review or not comparable
  • Avoid placing closely related variations in the same version
  • Track how often each question is used

Rigoriva organizes these controlled variations as Question Families.

Comparable versions

Create multiple assessment versions—not merely shuffled papers

Every version is built against the same approved assessment requirements. Rigoriva selects suitable question variations, balances their use and checks each version before publication.

  1. 01

    One blueprint

    The same approved requirements for every version.

  2. 02

    Multiple versions

    Different approved variations per version, usage balanced.

  3. 03

    Comparability checks

    Coverage, difficulty, marks and time compared before publishing.

  4. 04

    Assign and compare

    Each assignment records its version; performance is compared after grading.

Multiple comparable versions from one blueprint
Controlled use of approved question variations
Balanced distribution of versions across a cohort
Design-time comparability checks before publication
Publication blocked by serious unresolved findings
Comparison of how versions performed after grading

Guided flow: Set up → Build versions → Check comparability → Publish → Assign → Results.

Before delivery: Rigoriva checks whether versions meet the same design requirements.

After grading: you can review how the versions actually performed. Blueprint alignment does not by itself guarantee statistical equivalence or fairness.

Find out whether the assessment worked

Go beyond final scores. Rigoriva helps identify questions that were too easy, confusing, weak at distinguishing performance or inconsistent across assessment versions.

Areas of knowledge or skill that need attention
Questions that were too easy or too difficult
Answer options that did not work as distractors
Questions that did not distinguish performance effectively
Overall assessment consistency
Differences between versions
Recommended Question Bank improvements

For assessment specialists: advanced measures include item difficulty, discrimination, distractor analysis, reliability and version-comparison indicators.

Where few responses exist, Rigoriva says so — more responses are needed before drawing a reliable comparison.

Sophisticated assessment without making every user an expert

Rigoriva recommends the next step based on the work already completed and adapts terminology, navigation and workflow detail to different organizations.

Guided next-step workflow based on work already completed
Quick and full assessment paths in the same platform
High-school, college and certification experience presets
Simplified and advanced presentations of the same tools
In-app walkthroughs of each major workflow
Configurable approvals and governance

Experiences by role

Assessment creators and reviewers

  • Define assessment requirements
  • Generate, review and approve questions
  • Build and publish assessments
  • Examine assessment-quality evidence

Learners and candidates

  • Access assigned assessments
  • Read instructions and track progress
  • Complete and submit responses with autosave
  • Receive results and feedback where permitted

Organizations

  • Configure roles and approvals
  • Share governed Question Banks
  • Apply terminology and branding
  • Monitor assessment and integration operations

Delivery and grading you can rely on

A focused experience for whoever sits the assessment, and grading that keeps authorized reviewers in charge.

Authenticated or access-code delivery
Timed attempts with autosave
Question navigation and progress tracking
Submission confirmation
Automatic scoring for supported objective questions
Review and override by authorized reviewers
AI-assisted rubric scoring for supported written responses
Attempt and integrity-event tracking

Integrity controls provide evidence for human review and complement your own policy. They are not formal proctoring.

Works with your learning environment

Synchronize courses and rosters, support assessment delivery and monitor integration activity from one operational view.

Canvas

Available

Course and roster sync, assignment publication and grade sync.

Moodle

Available

Course and roster sync, grade sync to an existing assignment activity.

Google Classroom

In development

Connector scaffolding exists; not yet available for production use.

Microsoft Teams

In development

Connector scaffolding exists; not yet available for production use.

Trust and human control

What we do — and honestly, what we don't claim.

Every AI-generated question is reviewable

Drafts land in a review state and stay editable until an authorized reviewer approves them.

People retain final approval

Nothing reaches a participant until a person has signed off on the assessment.

Source alignment is recorded

The platform tracks which material, topic and learning goal each question came from.

Organization data is separated

Assessment, participant and question data is scoped to your organization through access controls.

Written responses can require human moderation

Rubric-assisted scoring can be configured so a person confirms before release.

Approval rules are not bypassed by AI

Approval and override decisions are recorded, and published versions preserve their generation and verification record.

We don't claim regulatory compliance, security certifications, formal proctoring or guaranteed accuracy. Human review remains part of every workflow.

Who it is for

Schools

Create quizzes, unit tests and multiple classroom versions while keeping teachers in control.

Colleges and universities

Build curriculum-aligned assessments and comparable forms across courses, sections and large cohorts.

Training providers

Assess knowledge and practical competencies consistently across repeated cohorts.

Certification organizations

Manage governed item banks, blueprints, candidate forms, approvals and performance evidence.

Workplace learning teams

Evaluate whether training, onboarding or compliance programs produced the intended knowledge and skill gains.

Frequently asked questions

How AI is used, where people stay in control, and what we do and do not claim.

  • AI assists

    Extraction, drafting, variation and explanation.

  • Rules enforce

    Validation, eligibility, coverage and publication.

  • Statistics inform

    Question quality, consistency and version comparison.

  • People decide

    Review, approval, overrides and release.

Still have questions?

Walk through how it works, start an account, or ask us directly.

Create your next assessment with the level of control you need

Start quickly or use the complete structured workflow to design, deliver and improve assessments at scale.